首页 理论教育 控制医疗费用不合理增长实施方案

控制医疗费用不合理增长实施方案

时间:2023-03-17 理论教育 版权反馈
【摘要】:第五节 结论与启示由于医学和技术的发展,人口结构的变迁,疾病谱的变化,公众预期的提升,以及医疗需求对国民经济的影响,使各国的医疗保健制度面临共同的费用压力,政治回应是必不可少的。但由于价值判断、社会预期和医疗卫生体制的差异,各国在控制医疗卫生费用方面面临不同的选择,所做出的政治回应是不相同的。在激励与管制之间寻求平衡才是最为重要的。
结论与启示_中国医疗保障制度改革研究:以美国为借鉴

第五节 结论与启示

由于医学和技术的发展,人口结构的变迁(特别是人口老龄化),疾病谱的变化,公众预期的提升,以及医疗需求对国民经济的影响,使各国的医疗保健制度面临共同的费用压力,政治回应是必不可少的。但由于价值判断、社会预期和医疗卫生体制的差异,各国在控制医疗卫生费用方面面临不同的选择,所做出的政治回应是不相同的。通过对相关理论的厘清和对发达国家费用控制实践的总结,我们认为有几个基本的价值理念值得遵循和借鉴:

第一,要消除急功近利的思想。因为费用问题的产生有极其复杂的原因,费用变化有周期性,因此,解决费用问题绝对没有简单的或一劳永逸的方案。

第二,政府与市场、管制与竞争是控制费用的两种主要工具,到底谁做得更好很难评说(66)。虽然政府管制越来越不受欢迎,但用自由放任的方法解决医疗问题也是不能容忍的。在激励与管制之间寻求平衡才是最为重要的。

第三,解决费用问题必须要有全局观。70多年前就有人说过,“卫生体制不是可以孤立地研究的一个问题,它是文化的一部分,它的组织安排与整个社会密不可分。”(67)要实现费用的可持续增长,需要消费者、雇主、保险方、医疗方和政府共同行动来控制费用;减小费用变化的幅度,对各方来说都是有利的,同时也是可以接受的,否则会损害各方的利益。面对公共医疗开支或私人医疗开支的快速增长,进行局部的改革是很不幸的(68);历史经验证明,控制整个制度的费用才是值得期待的(69)

第四,费用控制方案的设计和选择要依各国的具体情况而定,没有统一的模式。

第五,从医疗卫生费用的未来走势来看,技术进步仍将是推动费用上涨最主要的动力,既要鼓励技术创新,又要限制技术应用,这是各国政府面临的两难问题,毕竟在医疗创新和费用控制之间存在冲突。关于技术变革与费用上涨的关系,我们将在下一章详细分析。

【注释】

(1)汽车在20世纪20年代、计算机在20世纪70年代和20世纪80年代的生产和使用都曾急剧增加。

(2)经济学家认为,医疗卫生服务与普通商品的区别至少有两个方面:一是医疗卫生服务的需求取决于个人的健康状况;二是医疗保险市场的特殊性,而保险的盛行又是医疗卫生经济最明显和最不同寻常的特点之一(Mark V.Pauly,“Taxation,Health Insurance,and Market Failure in the Medical Economy”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.24,No.2,June 1986:629-675)。

(3)Joseph P.Newhouse,“An Iconoclastic View of Health Cost Containment”,Health Affairs,Supplement 1993:152-171.

(4)David M.Cutler,“Equality,Efficiency,and Market Fundamentals:The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.40,No.3,Sep.2002:881-906.

(5)David M.Cutler,“The Cost and Financing of Health Care”,American Economic Review,Vol.85,No.2,Papers and Proceedings of the Hundredth and Seventh Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association(May,1995):32-37.

(6)Henry J.Aaron,“Should Public Policy Seek to Control the Growth of Health Care Spending?”Health Affairs,8 January 2003,Web Exclusive:28-36.

(7)Mark V.Pauly,“Taxation,Health Insurance,and Market Failure in the Medical Economy”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.24,No.2,June 1986:629-675.

(8)Stuart H.Altman,et al.,“Health Care Spending:An Analytical Forum”,Health Affairs,January/February 2003,Vol.22,No.1:12.

(9)David M.Cutler,“Equality,Efficiency,and Market Fundamentals:The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.40,No.3,Sep.2002:881-906.

(10)David M.Cutler,and Mark McClellan,“Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?”Health Affairs,September/October 2001,Vol.20,No.5:11-29.

(11)Joseph P.Newhouse,“Medical Care Costs:How Much Welfare Loss?”The Journal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.6,No.3,Summer 1992:3-21.

(12)Uwe E.Reinhardt,et al.,“Cross-National Comparisons of Health System Using OECD Date,1999”,Health Affairs,May/June 2002,Vol.21,No.3:169-181.

(13)Michael E.Chernew,et al.,“Increased Spending on Health Care:How Much Can the United States Afford?”Health Affairs,July/August 2003,Vol.22,No.4: 15-25.

(14)Uwe E.Reinhardt,et al.,“US Health Care Spending in An International Context”,Health Affairs,May/June 2004,Vol.23,No.3:10-25.

(15)Henry A.Shenkin,Medical Care Reform:A Guide to Issues and Choices.SantaMonica:Oakvale Press,1994:Xii.

(16)大卫·N·海曼:《公共财政:现代理论在政策中的应用》,章彤译,中国财政经济出版社2001年,第309页。

(17)转引自约翰·F·沃克、哈罗德·G·瓦特:《美国大政府的兴起》,重庆出版社2001年,第264页。

(18)David Mechanic,and David A.Rochefort,Comparative Medical Systems.Annual Review of Sociology,Vol.22,1996:239-270.

(19)Henry J.Aaron,The Unsurprising Surprise of Renewed health Care Cost Inflation.Health Affairs,23 January 2002,Web Exclusive:85-87.

(20)Annetine Gelijns,and Nathan Rosenberg,The Dynamics of Technological Change in Medicine.Health Affairs,Summer 1994:28-46.

(21)The Technological Change in Health Care(TECH)Research Network,Technological Change around the World:Evidence from Heart Attack Care.Health Affairs,May/June 2001,Vol.20,No.3:25-42.

(22)Kennelth J.Arrow,“Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care”,American Economic Review,December 1963,Vol.53,No.3:41-73.

(23)MichaelE.Chernew,PeterD.Jacobson,TimothyP.Hofer,Keith D.Aaronson,and A Mark Fendrick,“Barriers to Constraining Health Care Cost Growth”,Health Affairs,Nov./Dec.2004,Vol.23,No.6:122-128.

(24)Kennelth J.Arrow,“Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care”,American Economic Review,December 1963,Vol.53,No.3:41-73.

(25)Howard L.Smith,Myron D.Fottler,and Borje O.Saxberg,“Cost Containment in Health Care:A Model for Management Research”,The Academy of Management Review,Vol.6,No.3,July 1981,397-407.

(26)医疗卫生领域的管理成本包括四部分:交易成本、利润管理成本、营销成本和规章制度的制定与执行方面的成本。

(27)Joseph P.Newhouse,“Medical Care Costs:How Much Welfare Loss?”TheJournal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.6,No.3,Summer 1992”3-21;and J.P.Newhouse,“An Iconoclastic View of Health Cost Containment”,Health Affaires,Supplement 1993:152-171。其前期的相关研究成果还包括:J.P.Newhouse,The Erosion of the Medical Marketplace,Santa Monica,Calif.:RAND,December,1978; and J.P.Newhouse,“Has the Erosion of the Medical Marketplace Ended?”Journal of Health Politics,Policy and Law,Summer 1988:263-278。

(28)Joseph P.Newhouse,“Medical Care Costs:How Much Welfare Loss?”TheJournal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.6,No.3,Summer 1992:3-21.

(29)Peter J.Neumann等人认为,关于技术推动费用的争论其实是一种误导,因为,技术本身不会提高价格,而是相关的制度在起作用;而且不管制度如何,问题的关键不是费用上升本身,而是在消耗资源的同时社会获得了什么(Peter J.Neumann,et al.,“From Principle to Public Policy:Using Cost-Effectiveness Analysis”,Health Affairs,Summer 1994:206-214);Victor Fuchs则对Newhouse的计算方法提出了质疑,认为他低估了人口老龄化对费用的影响(Joseph P.Newhouse,“Medical Care Costs:How Much Welfare Loss?”The Journal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.6,No.3,Summer 1992:3-21)。

(30)Victor R.Fuchs,“Economics,Values,and Health Care Reform”,AmericaEconomic Review 1996,86(1):1-24.

(31)Edgar A.Peden,and Mark S.Freeland,“A Historical Analysis of Medical Spending Growth,1960-1993”,Health Affairs,Summer 1995:235-247.

(32)Uwe E.Reinhardt,“Health Insurance and Cost-Containment Policies:The Experience Abroad”,American Economic Review,Vol.70,No.2,Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association(May,1980):149-156.

(33)Thomas Bodenheimer,“The Not-So-Sad History of Medicare Cost Containment as Told in One Chart”,Health Affairs,23 January 2002,Web Exclusive:88-90.

(34)Kant Patel and Mark E.Rushefsky.Health Care Politics and Policy in America,2nded.Armonk:M.E.Sharpe,Inc.1999:164-165.

(35)Mark V.Pauly,“Is medical Care Different?”in Warren Greenberg(ed.),Competition in the Health Care Sector:Past,Present,and Future.Germantown,Maryland:Aspen Systems Corporation,1978:33.

(36)Mark V.Pauly,“Is Medical Care Different?Old Questions,New Answers”,Journal of Health Politics,Policy and Law 13,No.2,Summer 1988:227-237.

(37)Stephen M.Weiner,“On Public Values and Private Regulation:Some Reflections on Cost Containment Strategies”,Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society,Vol.59,No.2,Spring 1981:269-296.

(38)Joseph P.Newhouse,“Medical Care Costs:How Much Welfare Loss?”TheJournal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.6,No.3,Summer 1992:3-21.

(39)David M.Cutler,“Equality,Efficiency,and Market Fundamentals:The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.40,No.3,Sep.2002:881-906.

(40)后来,PSRO更名为同行评议组织(PRO)。

(41)Uwe E.Reinhardt,“Health Insurance and Cost-Containment Policies:The Experience Abroad”,American Economic Review,Vol.70,No.2,Papers and Proceedings of the Ninety-Second Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association(May,1980):149-156.

(42)David M.Cutler,“Equality,Efficiency,and Market Fundamentals:The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.40,No.3,Sep.2002:881-906.

(43)Walter McClure,“Structure and Incentive Problem in Economic Regulation ofMedical Care”,Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society,Vol.59,No.2,Spring 1981:107-144.

(44)Alain C.Enthoven,“Competition in the Marketplace:Health Care in the 1980s”,in James R.Gay and Barbara J.Sax Jacobs(eds.),Competition in the Marketplace:Health Care in the 1980s,New York:Spectrum Publication,1982:18-19.

(45)这里并不排除为保证公平竞争而采取的监督和干预措施,如反垄断法等。

(46)Paul Starr,“Changing the Balance of Power in American Medicine”,Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly/Health and Society,Vol.58,No.1,Winter 1980:170.

(47)Nicholas Barr,“Economic Theory and the Welfare State:A Survey and Interpretation”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.30,No.2,June 1992:741-803.

(48)所谓起付线,就是被保险人在享受保险待遇之前,必须支付一定数量的费用,支付标准往往是固定的;所谓共同保险,就是一旦费用超过了起付线,被保险人要按一定比例承担部分医疗费;所谓共付额,就是被保险人对所接受的每项服务都要支付固定数量的费用,而不是按比例出资。

(49)被保险人对费用分担的反应程度可以用其支出的弹性系数来衡量,也就是自费成本每增加1%,被保险人支出下降的比例。Eichner关于这一问题的研究结论是-0.62(Matthew J.Eichner,“The Demand for Medical Care:What People Pay Does Matter”,American Economic Review,Vol.88,No.2,Papers and Proceedings of the Hundredth and Tenth Annual Meeting of the American Economic Association,May 1998:117-121);而其他两项类似的研究得出的弹性系数(绝对值)要小一些,分别是-0.22(Joseph P.Newhouse,Free for All:Lessons from the RAND Health Insurance Experimen,.Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press.)和-0.22~-0.32之间(Matthew J.Eichner,“Incentives,Price Expectations,and Medical Expenditures:An Analysis of Claims under Employer-Provided Health Insurance”,Mimeo,Massachusetts Institute of Technology,1997.)

(50)Karen Davis,Gerard F.Anderson,Diane Rowland,and Earl P.Steinberg,Health Care Cost Containment.Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press,1990: 126.

(51)Randall P.Ellis,and Thomas G.McGuire,“Supply-Side and Demand-SideCost Sharing in Health Care”,The Journal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.7,No.4,Autumn 1993:135-151.

(52)当然,供方可以通过交叉补贴(cross subsidy)的方式将慈善医疗的费用转嫁给其他收费服务的人群,但这样做会提高医疗服务的价格,对供方而言仍然是有风险的。

(53)Dennis R.Heffley,Thomas J.Miceli,“The Economic of Incentive-Based Health Care Plans”,The Journal of Risk and Insurance,Vol.65,No.3,Sep.1998: 445-465.

(54)Nicholas Barr,“Economic Theory and the Welfare State:A Survey and Interpretation”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.30,No.2,June 1992:741-803.

(55)Stuart H.Altman,and Sanford L.Weiner,“Regulation as a Second Best”,inWarren Greenberg(ed.),Competition in the Health Care Sector:Past,Present,and Future,Germantown,Maryland:Aspen Systems Corporation,1978:339.

(56)美国斯坦福大学经济学教授Alain C.Enthoven是managed competition的积极倡导者和理论创始人。他从20世纪70年代末开始,通过一系列的论著,系统阐述了managed competition的理念和制度设想,是90年代初克林顿医疗改革重要的理论基础。Enthoven的相关著述包括:A.C.Enthoven,Health Plan:The Only Practical Solution to the Soaring Cost of Medical Care.Reading,Mass.:Addison-Wesley,1980;A.C.Enthoven,“Managed Competition in Health Care and the Unfinished Agenda”,Health Care Financing Review,1986 Annual Supplement:105-119; A.C.Enthoven,“Managed Competition:An Agenda for Action”,Health Affairs,Summer 1988:25-47;A.C.Enthoven,Theory and Practice of Managed Competition in Health Care Finance,1987,Professor Dr.F.de Vries Lectures,North-Holland/American Elsevier,1988;A.C.Enthoven and R.Kronick,“A Consumer Choice Health Plan for the 1990s:Universal Health Insurance in a System Designed to Promote Quality and Economy”,The New England Journal of Medicine,5 and 12 January 1989:29-37 and 94-101;A.C.Enthoven and R.Kronick,“Universal Health Insurance through Incentives Reform”,Journal of the American Medical Association,15 May 1991:2532-2536; and A.C.Enthoven,“The History and Principles of Managed Competition”,Health Affairs,Supplement 1993:24-48.

(57)公共医疗保险计划实际上也是一种政府管制的形式。

(58)Henry J.Aaron,Barry P.Bosworth,David M.Cutler,and Mark V.Pauly.“Economic Issues in Reform of Health Care Financing”,Brookings Papers on Economic Activity.Microeconomics,Vol.1994:249-299.

(59)Henry J.Aaron,“Should Public Policy Seek to Control the Growth of Health Care Spending?”Health Affairs,8 January 2003,Web Exclusive:28-36.

(60)加拿大、法国、德国、意大利、英国、日本等国家的费用变化与费用控制情况请参阅David M.Cutler,“Equality,Efficiency,and Market Fundamentals: The Dynamics of International Medical-Care Reform”,Journal of Economic Literature,Vol.40,No.3,Sep.2002:881-906。

(61)Mark V.Pauly,“Should We Be Worried about High Real Medical Spending Growth in the United States?”Health Affairs,8 January 2003,Web Exclusive:15-27.

(62)英国的全民医疗保险制度叫国家卫生服务(National Health Services,NHS)。

(63)参见张奇林:《美国医疗保障制度研究》,人民出版社2005年,第24~29页。

(64)David M.Cutler,and Mark McClellan,“Is Technological Change in Medicine Worth It?”Health Affairs,September/October 2001,Vol.20,No.5:11-29.

(65)Joseph P.Newhouse,“An Iconoclastic View of Health Cost Containment”,Health Affairs,Supplement 1993:152-171.

(66)单纯从费用控制的效果来说,政府管制要好于市场竞争,但从政府管制所带来的后果以及费用变化的周期性来看,政府管制是否真正好于市场竞争就很难说了。

(67)转引自Victor R.Fuchs,“Economics,Values,and Health Care Reform”,America Economic Review 1996,86(1):1-24。

(68)Randall P.Ellis,and Thomas G.McGuire,“Supply-Side and Demand-Side Cost Sharing in Health Care”,The Journal of Economic Perspectives,Vol.7,No.4,Autumn 1993:135-151.

(69)Joseph P.Newhouse,“An Iconoclastic View of Health Cost Containment”,Health Affairs,Supplement 1993:152-171.

免责声明:以上内容源自网络,版权归原作者所有,如有侵犯您的原创版权请告知,我们将尽快删除相关内容。

我要反馈