议论文（Argument）是一种说理性文体，文章中由作者提出支持性理由和论据来论证自己的观点，常被用于劝说某人做出某种决定或采取某种措施。
根据定义可以看出，首先，议论文（Argument）并不等同于争论，其目标不是为了攻击对手或给读者留下深刻印象。事实上，议论文（Argument）这种文体的主要目标是针对热点话题进行探讨，并提供足够的理由来支持自己的观点。其次，议论文（Argument）主要是劝说性文体（Arguments are meant to be persuasive），所以一篇文章通常包括主旨、理由、论据和结论这几个组成部分。（Arguments have claims，reasons，evidences and conclusions。）
“知己知彼，百战不殆”，写作文前，让我们先一起了解一下新SAT考试写作部分阅读材料的来源和出处。
官方的考试说明中对资料文本有详细的介绍。所选取的资料文本都是已发表在刊物上的、具有广泛的高端读者群的、具有挑战性的、话题范围多样的议论文（Argument），即社论（Editorial），文本长度大约为650~750词。
"All passages are taken from high-quality, previously published sources. While the specific style and content of the passages inevitably vary to some extent given the College Board's commitment to using authentic texts with this task, the passages take the general form of what might be called arguments written for a broad audience. That is, the passages examine ideas, debates, trends, and the like in the arts, the sciences, and civic, cultural, and political life that have wide interest, relevance, and accessibility to a general readership. Passages tend not to be simple pro/con debates on issues but instead strive to convey nuanced views on complex subjects. They are notable, too, for their use of evidence, logical reasoning, and/or stylistic and persuasive elements."
(Quoted from The Redesigned SAT Specification)
阅读材料所涉及的话题非常广泛，探讨的内容涵盖艺术、科学、民主、文化和政治等各个领域的观点、演说、争论、倾向和偏好等。
阅读材料不是简单的关于争议性话题的支持或反驳，而是关于复杂问题的细致入微的探讨。文章通常都使用了具有特色的论据、论证、风格与论证要素。
新SAT写作中的阅读材料通常来自美国本土主流刊物的社论部分，比如《纽约时报》《洛杉矶时报》等。美国本土主流刊物的“观点专栏”在报纸的各个版面中占有最高的阅读率，它的重要性堪比“首页新闻”。这一专栏的读者群除了普通民众之外，还有政府官员和公司高层。而阅读资料又主要由来自“观点专栏”的两种类型的文章组成：社论（Editorials，即Ed.，由本报新闻评论员撰写）和社论对页（Opposite the Editorials，即Op-Ed.，由非本报的专业人员或专家撰写）。其中社论对页在资料文本中被大量采用，这些文章的特色是具有强烈的争议性和学术性，文章的目标是引发社会的讨论和争议。
新SAT作文的考查方向由“说服技巧”转化为“分析技巧”。在写分析性作文时，考生需要在文章中给出主旨及主题句，并从考试给定的资料文本中选取论据来支持自己的分析，所以透彻阅读资料文本是写出一篇优秀作文的“基石”。
现在我们来介绍三种基本的阅读技巧。
略读是一种快速了解文章信息的方式。我们不需要逐字逐句地读，而是利用有选择的阅读方式来跳过细节，把握文章大意。
对于SAT作文的阅读材料，我们可以从以下几个方面进行略读：
1）跳过顶部的考试说明（Prompt），略读底部的考试说明（Prompt）
考试说明（Prompt）位于阅读文章开头顶部和结尾底部的方框中。其中顶部的考试说明（Prompt）在每次考试中（除作者名字）是固定不变的；底部的考试说明（Prompt）基本不变，每次变化的只有一句总结作者行文目标的表述，我们可以找出并掌握这句话。
考生基本不需要在考试期间阅读考试说明，只需在备考期间找一个官方的固定版本，读懂并知道主要任务就可以了。
考试说明（Prompt）示例如下：
As you read the passage below, consider how Peter S. Goodman uses
● evidence, such as facts or examples, to support claims.
● reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence.
● stylistic or persuasive elements, such as word choice or appeals to emotion, to add power to the ideas expressed.
Write an essay in which you explain how Peter S. Goodman builds an argument to persuade his audience that news organizations should increase the amount of professional foreign news coverage provided to people in the United States. In your essay, analyze how Goodman uses one or more of the features listed in the box above (or features of your own choice) to strengthen the logic and persuasiveness of his argument. Be sure that your analysis focuses on the most relevant features of the passage.
在考试说明（Prompt）中规定了作文的任务和目标，具体可参照下面表格中的译文：
阅读下文并思考作者Peter S. Goodman如何使用
● 事实或事例等论据来支持自己的观点；
● 论证方式来展开观点以及连接主旨与论据；
● 选词、诉诸情感等文体及说服技巧来增加观点的力度。
请写一篇作文来阐释作者Peter S. Goodman是如何针对新闻机构为美国人民增加专业性外国新闻报道的必要性，用自己的议论文（Argument）来说服读者的。考生的作文中需要分析Goodman如何使用方框中列出的（或考生自己选择的）一种或多种特征来增强自己议论文的逻辑和说服力。确保你的分析专注于跟材料文章最相关的特征。
2）阅读黑体字中的标题
文章的开头上方有一段黑体字，引号中的内容就是这则新闻报道的标题。一般根据标题就能大致推测出文章的题材。
如图所示，本篇材料文本的标题就是“Foreign News at a Crisis Point”，依据题目我们可以推测出，本篇文章可能是关于文化和新闻方面的题材。
3）阅读大意
用略慢的速度阅读文章的第一段、结尾段及每段的开始句和结尾句，体会文章的特色和语气，然后找出主旨句，并粗略地把握文章的内容。
示例
在下面的文章中，通过对第1、2段的略读，我们就已经能大致推测出几个信息，即：作者的语气是担忧的；文章的主题是黑暗的重要性；针对的现象是人造光的泛滥，自然黑夜的减少。
At my family's cabin on a Minnesota lake, I knew woods so dark that my hands disappeared before my eyes. I knew night skies in which meteors left smoky trails across sugary spreads of stars. But now, when 8 of 10 children born in the United States will never know a sky dark enough for the Milky Way, I worry we are rapidly losing night's natural darkness before realizing its worth. This winter solstice, as we cheer the days' gradual movement back toward light, let us also remember the irreplaceable value of darkness.
All life evolved to the steady rhythm of bright days and dark nights. Today, though, when we feel the closeness of nightfall, we reach quickly for a light switch. And too little darkness, meaning too much artificial light at night, spells trouble for all.
Already the World Health Organization classifies working the night shift as a probable…
注读包括了精读和批注。精读（Close Reading）常常被用于短篇文章，即利用精确细致的阅读方式来获取细节信息。而批注（Annotation）则用于精读时对信息的标注，以便于读者记录其阅读理解的过程，两者合称为“注读”。在注读的过程中，我们需要注意以下几点：
1）把握段落及篇章结构
用批注的方式（一般是下划线）标注出篇章主旨、段落主题句及篇章结论句；注意过渡句或过渡词，因为这些句或词的出现，标志着重要或一般语义的转换。
示例
In today's crowded, louder, more fast-paced world, night's darkness can provide solitude, quiet and stillness, qualities increasingly in short supply.（主题句）Every religious tradition has considered darkness invaluable for a soulful life, and the chance to witness the universe has inspired artists, philosophers and everyday stargazers since time began. In a world awash with electric light...how would Van Gogh have given the world his "Starry Night"? Who knows what this vision of the night sky might inspire in each of us, in our children or grandchildren?
Yet all over the world, our nights are growing brighter.（转折句及主题句）In the United States and Western Europe, the amount of light in the sky increases an average of about 6% every year.
2）把握主要技巧
理解并把握文本的特征性论据、语气及风格论证技巧等文本技巧。通过一些标志性语言找出作者在文章中采用的技巧，如通过数字来判断论据方式，通过一些形象生动的表达来判定修辞方式等。
示例
In today's crowded, louder, more fast-paced world, night's darkness can provide solitude, quiet and stillness, qualities increasingly in short supply. Every religious tradition has considered darkness invaluable for a soulful life, and the chance to witness the universe has inspired artists, philosophers and everyday stargazers since time began. In a world awash with electric light...how would Van Gogh have given the world his "Starry Night"? Who knows what this vision of the night sky might inspire in each of us, in our children or grandchildren? （修辞手法：Allusion）
Yet all over the world, our nights are growing brighter. In the United States and Western Europe, the amount of light in the sky increases an average of about 6% every year. Computer images of the United States at night, based on NASA photographs, show that what was a very dark country as recently as the 1950s is now nearly covered with a blanket of light. Much of this light is wasted energy, which means wasted dollars. Those of us over 35 are perhaps among the last generation to have known truly dark nights. （论据手法：Statistics ＆ Survey）Even the northern lake where I was lucky to spend my summers has seen its darkness diminish.
3）把握细节
一篇具有广泛读者群且有争议性的文章，它的词汇往往是经过字斟句酌而精心选择的，某些选词更是有目的地去表达某种特殊效果。所以在精读过程中，应标注特殊选词，尤其是那些与支持文章主旨或主题句相关的或表达某种修辞效果的词汇和数据等。
4）批注
读者可以在注读时，在页面的边缘空白处及字里行间做出批注。批注的顺序及常用符号如下图所示：
示例
在平时练习时，学生要注意使用清晰的、一致的符号进行系统性的批注练习，这样才能在写作文时快速选择并标出自己所需要的信息。
下面我们通过问答的形式学习一篇完整的议论文批注。（Reading an argument and answering the following question.）
Adapted from Anna Lee, "We're throwing away tons of fruits and veggies for not being pretty enough." @ 2015 by Washington Post. Originally published March 13, 2015.
Anna Lee is a PhD student in the Emmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources at Stanford University.
You can always tell when I've been munching from a bowl of tortilla chips because the only ones left are the perfect ones: all three corners intact, no folded edges, no giant air bubbles. The broken chips and burnt bits and crumbs usually lurking at the bottom of the bowl are gone. I ate them.
● In the first sentence, "munching" is used to indicate what?
Snacking.
● If the only information available was the first paragraph, what would you think the remainder of the article was about?
The writer is discussing eating something that isn't perfect, so I would think the remainder of the article is about imperfect food.
I like to eat the weird ones, whether it's chips or cauliflower. I habitually seek the nonconformist food products: the intertwined "love carrots," the kiwi twins, the apples with codling moth damage, the kale leaves that the cabbage loopers have nibbled. I picked up this habit while I was working on an organic farm in California, where we grew everything from strawberries to chard to sweet corn. When we harvested "seconds" — the perfectly edible, often slightly more delicious, fruits and veggies that weren't quite pretty enough to offer to our customers — they went directly to our own kitchen, where we ate them with (or made them into) relish.
● In the second paragraph, how many ways is the word "relish" used?
Two.
● Explain your answer to the last question.
There are two meanings here for relish. First, saying "relish" is a way to indicate enjoyment. For example, I relish the experience of walking on The Great Wall. So when the writer says "We ate them with relish" it means that they ate them with joy and pleasure. Second, relish is a kind of food made out of vegetables. So the writer puts parentheses around "or made them into" as a way to point out this play on words and the two meanings of "relish" since this is an article about enjoying food.
That farm was lucky to have a built-in community of people excited to consume the odd ones, but that's not how the rest of our food system works. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations estimates that high cosmetic standards in the retail industry exclude 20 to 40 percent of fresh produce from the market. Sometimes farmers can sell those unwanted to processors making jam or cider or pickles, but as those systems rely increasingly on mechanization, they become less flexible when it comes to shape and size. Tons of food — 800 to 900 million tons globally each year, the weight of 9,000 Nimitz-class aircraft carriers — rot in storage or don't make it out of the fields because farmers can't find a market.
● What is the main focus of this paragraph?
The main focus of this paragraph is the amount of food being wasted.
● Why does the writer say so much food is wasted?
The writer says food is wasted because of automation standards of machinery and cosmetic standards of the retail market.
● What does the writer use to make the reader understand how much food is wasted?
The writer uses statistics and a comparison to gigantic ships.
● In this paragraph, what is meant by "cosmetic?"
Cosmetic here refers to the physical appearance of the fruits and vegetables.
● What does the writer want us to feel in this sentence?
The writer wants us to be shocked by the amount of food that is wasted.
The organic farm where I worked marketed primarily through a farm stand and a subscription service, so we had the luxury of communicating directly with our customers about why our produce looked the way it did. But farmers selling through distributors face very different standards. Some criteria are rightly based on food-safety and shelf-life considerations, but many are manifestations of misguided normative ideas about what produce should look like. Cucumbers should be straight, cauliflower florets should be tightly held, and rhubarb stalks should be ruby red. If not, retailers tell farmers, consumers won't buy them.
● In this paragraph, how does the writer feel about farmers?
The writer is sympathetic to farmers.
● How do you know this?
The writer is acknowledging that the farmer has many difficulties to overcome that are not his fault and that are often unreasonable.
I worked on a second farm that sent much more produce to the compost pile. Beet butts, the ones that have deep vertical creases, and knobby potatoes were doomed. Kohlrabi that had grown too fast and split and Brussels sprout stalks that had seen any aphid action also got axed, even though the bugs pose no health risk. Even on the organic farm, we had to leave a lot of chard in the fields — our subscription-service customers, who tended to accept or even prefer imperfect produce, objected to certain types of damage to chard leaves.
● What is the goal of this paragraph?
In this paragraph, the writer is illustrating the inconsistencies from one farm to the next in the amount and types of food wasted.
● Why does the writer use the words "doomed" and "axed?"
The writer uses these words to make the reader think of a person who is facing a loss of a job, because both of these words are commonly used when talking about an employee in danger of being fired or laid off. The foods are going to be "fired" because they aren't pretty enough.
Farmers recognize that they're at the whim of nature, and they plan accordingly, sowing extra seed with the assumption that pests, diseases or weather will take out some of the crop. That's part of life. But when plants survive all of that, only to be rejected because they happen to be too small, a little twisted or not quite evenly colored, the loss is harder to face. My heart broke a little as I wheeled barrows of unmarketable onions that had grown long and skinny instead of short and round to the compost pile, or surveyed a field dotted with winter squash that we'd had to leave behind because the vegetables had been nibbled by bugs or were too small. The nutrients in that produce would go back into the soil and nourish next year's crops, which was a noble purpose in its own right. But it was not the future we'd planned for our seedlings. Good farmers invest themselves in their crops with visions of feeding their communities. To see our produce fall short of its potential, our efforts thwarted by senseless prejudice, struck me as an absurd injustice. Plant an extra row for the bugs, or one for the gophers, or one for the drought, sure — but an extra row for narrow-mindedness?
● What does the writer focus on here?
The writer focuses on the amount crops planted by the farmer.
● What things determine how much the farmer plants?
The farmer will plant according to anticipated problems such as bad weather, pests, plant diseases, and imperfect produce.
● In this article, what is the meaning of "produce?"
Produce is used here to mean fruits and vegetables.
● Does the writer think the farmer's reasons are logical and does she agree with them?
The writer thinks the reasons are logical, but she does not agree with planting additional crops just because some of them might make ugly fruits and vegetables.
● Does the writer like farmers?
Yes.
This system hurts more than the wallets and feelings of farmers — it's a tremendous waste of resources. The U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization estimates that global food wastage, about half of which occurs during production and post-harvest handling and storage, was responsible for 3.6 billion tons of CO2 equivalent emissions in 2007, the most recent year for which data is available; that's more CO2 than Brazil, Japan and Australia together emitted in 2011. Wasted food also takes 250 cubic kilometers of water to produce every year, which is 38 times the amount used by all households in the United States combined.
● What is the focus of this paragraph?
The focus of this paragraph is the environmental impact of wasting food.
● What parts of the environment are impacted in the process of wasting the food?
There are greenhouse gases produced and water wasted.
● What does the writer use to illustrate the volume of environmental waste?
The writer uses a comparison.
By insisting on perfect-looking produce, customers also cheat themselves of taste and variety. Apple breeders used to select specifically for russetting because it was associated with longer shelf life. That's how we got Hudson's Golden Gem, a delicious variety that's a favorite among my farmer friends. But you'll never find a Gem in a standard grocery store today, precisely because of that russetting. We've decided that apples should be shiny, not rough; large, not small; and red or green, but definitely not brown; so now what we find in stores are piles of uniform red delicious apples with latex-like skin, mealy flesh and no complexity of flavor. Customers are missing out on the pleasures of a russetted apple: the coarse texture against the tongue and the concentrated flavor of the dense flesh that accompanies it.
● What is the focus of this paragraph?
The writer is illustrating how farmers in the past would grow crops more for their taste and longevity and less for their appearance.
● Does the writer prefer the pretty and perfect or the ugly and imperfect?
The writer prefers the ugly and imperfect.
● How do you know this?
The writer talks about an apple with a perfect appearance in a negative way, and talks about all of the perfect points as if they are bad things.
Consumers waste plenty of food after the point of purchase, and we can change our habits to curb that — by planning our grocery trips better; by ignoring "best by" dates, which indicate nothing about the safety of the food; by saving those overripe bananas for banana bread. But we can help cut waste upstream as well by embracing broader aesthetic standards. Choose the odd tomatoes and the gnarly parsnips. Buy the undersize beets and the broken almonds. Tell our grocers and our farmers that we'd rather have a slightly dented butternut squash than a hot, dry planet. Support businesses that help get the less-beautiful produce out of fields and onto consumers' tables. (One French grocer, Intermarché, began buying "ugly" produce in 2014 and selling it at slightly reduced prices at several locations; the success prompted the company to expand the initiative to all of its stores.) We can stop our valuable food — every pound of which represents a sizable investment of energy, water, labor and money — from leaving the system without fulfilling is purpose.
● What is the purpose of this paragraph?
The writer is trying to encourage people not to waste food and suggests ways to make that happen.
● Does the writer believe this is practical?
Yes, because she gives an example of a supermarket chain that sold imperfect product and had a great success with it.
By all means, eat the beautiful ones and celebrate the unblemished apple that nature is capable of producing. But don't neglect their equally nutritious, no less wondrous, slightly unconventional brethren. When you stop to consider how much you're really saving, you may even find they taste better.
● What is the purpose of this paragraph?
This paragraph is the conclusion.
● What does the writer want us to do?
The writer suggest us to eat both pretty and ugly fruits and vegetables because both are excellent food sources.
示例
Reading an argument and answering the following questions.（请大家先自己回答，然后再参照给出的答案打分。）
Adapted from Anne Karpf, "Our cities must undergo a revolution for older people." @ 2015 by The Guardian. Originally published March 15, 2015.
Stand at the traffic lights on a major street in any city. Now, when the green man invites you, try to cross the road. Unless you have the acceleration of an Olympic sprinter, the chances are that the beeps will stop, the green man will flash and cars will rev impatiently before you've reached the sanctuary of the other side. Especially if you have a disability, are pushing a buggy or laden with shopping. Or are old. The Department of Health says the average walking speed demanded by pedestrian crossings is 1.2 meters a second, while the average speed of the older pedestrian is just 0.7 to 0.9 meters per second.
1. What is the purpose of this paragraph?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
2. What does the reader think it is like to be an elderly person in a big city?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
3. How does the writer make you know this?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Why does the writer underline the information in the last sentence?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Cities are designed for a mythical average person — super-mobile, without dependents or disabilities and with a cast-iron bladder. This person is more likely to be young than old. And yet by 2030, two-thirds of the world's population will be living in cities and, in high-income societies, a quarter of them will be over the age of 60.
5. In this paragraph, what does the writer believe about cities?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
6. What word tells you this?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
7. In the last sentence, how much is one quarter?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Why is this important?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
There's a paradox at the heart of cities and old people, and it's this: all the research on health and wellbeing—and there's reams of it—suggests that old people are more content and more likely to flourish if they go out, participate in local life and have a decent amount of social interaction.
9. What is the purpose of this paragraph?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
And yet about half of people over 65 face problems getting outdoors; for them the city is an inhospitable place, with its cluttered streets, uneven pavements, poor lighting and signage. Details — like the bus driver who moves off before you have time to sit down, or doesn't park close enough to the curb — have a huge impact on their sense of confidence and safety. But if they stay in — in "self-imposed house arrest", as Chris Phillipson, professor of sociology and social gerontology at the University of Manchester, calls it — their physical and mental health is liable to deteriorate, and they're prone to isolation and depression.
10. What is the purpose of this paragraph?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
The result is that our city centers have become age-cleansed youth enclaves, where the only older people to be seen (in theatres, museums and concerts) are affluent ones. "It's a form of spatial injustice that has crept up on us: we've come to accept that certain areas of the urban environment are appropriate only for certain income groups and ages, as if that's just how it is," says Phillipson. "It's quite dangerous, as if we're pushing certain social groups back into the home." Where they become, literally, socially invisible.
11. How does this paragraph differ from the previous paragraph in #10?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
12. Does the writer believe there are many older people enjoying public places?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
13. Why?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
14. What assumption is the writer making about most elderly people in large cities?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
15. How do you know this?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
It's curious, then, that the chief narrative about aging should dwell so much on biomedical ideas of declining bodies requiring clinical solutions, and so little on the ways in which the environment is itself disabling for older people. It's an approach that privatizes public experience, displacing it on to the individual and their deteriorating capacities. Aging becomes a "problem", and a personal matter rather than a relational one that takes place in the symbiosis of body and culture. What would it be like to reconfigure this, so we're not seen as impaired by age—to understand that human needs change over a lifetime and the well-designed city should be sensitive to them?
16. What is the purpose of this paragraph?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
17. How does the writer believe people are currently acting about becoming older?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
This is precisely what the World Health Organization has done with its Age-Friendly Cities project, set up in 2006, which shows how the physical and social environment can help people "age actively". Now 258 cities and communities have signed up to what has become a global network, with Manchester in 2010 the first British city to join. The concept of "age-friendly" cities seems to be having a moment, with three events on age-friendly cities taking place this month. Public Wisdom, which runs an education program and has organized one of the events, is even campaigning to turn Angel in Islington, north London, into the UK's first age-friendly town center.
18. What is the purpose of this paragraph?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
19. Why is this important?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
But what does all this actually mean? Peruse the literature on this matter and you end up suffering from mission statement fatigue. Much of what's being called for is simply an improvement to the fabric of the city. Better housing? Check. Better public transport? Check. Better infrastructure? Check. It's a wish-list that, whatever our ages, we'd all applaud. Yet we're living in an age of savage slicing of public services, with city centers shaped by marauding developers who care not at all if they're age-friendly or even people-friendly.
Are the abundant joint strategies, steering groups, actions, plans, forums, workshops and hubs advocating "age-friendly" cities anything more than, at best, an aspiration that demonstrates how age-unfriendly most cities are?
20. Does the writer believe that the changes needed to cities will benefit only old people?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
21. How do you know this?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
22. Does the writer approve of the way builders design city facilities?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
23. How do you know this?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
24. What does the writer think prevents many of these things from happening?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
25. How do you know this?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
Paul McGarry, of the Age-Friendly Manchester program, concedes that, while there may be "an element of slogan to it, we're trying to change the way that old people are perceived". And then I realize that I've been looking in the wrong place — searching for the grand gesture, the sweeping change: age-friendly by government fiat. In reality, age-friendly changes are taking place all around us at the level where most of us live — locally and hyper-locally. They are micro-changes, which is why they're so easily overlooked. The take-a-seat initiative, in Manchester's Old Moat area, gave chairs to a row of local shops so that people could sit down, without any pressure to buy or consume on the premises. Like putting shelters and seats at bus stops, this also encourages social interaction.
26. Does the writer believe the necessary changes are being made?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
27. Does the writer believe the changes are being made all at one time?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
28. What examples show that the changes are slow and small?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
29. How does the person quoted think old people are perceived now?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
30. How do you know this?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
In the newly reopened Whitworth gallery all the guides are trained to be "dementia-friendly". Manchester's Band on the Wall club is reclaimed every couple of months for clubbers over 50. Then there are age-friendly gardens, with raised planting beds to make them accessible to people in wheelchairs, age-friendly parks (no steps), and in Newcastle the "vitality bench" (arm-rests that help you get up, and warm-to-touch materials).
Other countries are innovating, too. Lyon's "cyclopousse" is a delightful pedicab transport service tailored for older people. The Adeg and Kaiser supermarket chains in Germany have wider aisles, non-skid floors, lower shelves, brighter lighting, larger price labels and magnifying glasses hanging from chains.
Most interesting, perhaps, are what Sophie Handler, author of the fabulously playful An Alternative Age-Friendly Handbook (co-produced in Manchester), calls "third spaces" and "meanwhile spaces". This is where ostensibly private spaces are "borrowed" as public spaces of rest and chat, blurring the boundary of public and private. They often retrofit or modify what already exists, as in Eindhoven, where a design group, physiotherapists and residents of a sheltered housing complex together transformed the lamp-posts, benches and fences on a street into an alternative "public gym". Participation in design is key: this in itself reconceives old people as an active resource, rather than passive victims of urban change.
31. What is the purpose of this paragraph?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
32. Are these changes things that anybody can enjoy or are they limited to be used only by old people?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
The ability to do leg-lifts in the street may not reverse the age-apartheid evident in city centers, but the revolution will be easier with bold new thinking and supple joints. We should start it now.
33. Does the writer think these changes will be quick or slow?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
34. How do you know this?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
35. Does the writer still think the changes should be made?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
36. Why?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
37. Can you think of an example of a change in your neighborhood that would help older people live better?
__________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________
答案
1. The writer wants the reader to imagine what it is like to be an elderly person in a big city.
2. She thinks it is difficult and sometimes dangerous.
3. She talks about the cars revving their engines very close to where the people are walking.
4. The writer underlines this to show the reader how important it is.
5. That they are designed for the kind of people who don't really exist.
6. Mythical.
7. 1/4.
8. Because it illustrates why all of these changes should be made. The world's population of older people is increasing, so changes are needed in order for them to live and be productive.
9. The writer wants the reader to know that elderly people have a better quality of life if they are able to go in public and interact with their neighbors.
10. The writer is describing the reasons why the city is not an easy place for older people to live.
11. In the previous paragraph, the writer is describing the conditions older people face in large cities. In this paragraph, the writer is showing how those conditions cause additional things to happen.
12. No.
13. Because she describes the city centers as "age-cleansed youth enclaves", which means there are not so many older people there.
14. That they don't all have a lot of money, which makes it harder for them to live in the big cities.
15. Because the writer says that the few older people you see in city centers are in places where people with a lot of money go. So that means the rest of the older people in cities don't go out because they don't have a lot of money.
16. The writer is suggesting that the conditions of the city are so obvious that it is surprising that nobody talks about how to make the conditions better for older people.
17. That it is a problem with the body and not a part of experiencing culture. That it is a sickness requiring medication and not just a stage of life that needs simple adjustments.
18. The writer is giving an example of how it is possible to have a city center that makes it easy for older people to enjoy it.
19. Because the writer wants to show that there is no reason for cities to continue not providing this kind of living for older people.
20. No.
21. Because the kinds of changes are things that can be used by all ages, not just elderly people. The writer says that all people like these things.
22. No.
23. The writer describes them as marauders who do not care if people can use the facilities easily.
24. Large reduction in government funding.
25. From "savage slicing of public services."
26. Yes.
27. No.
28. Covered bus stops with benches and shops with chairs in front.
29. Unwelcome and inconvenient.
30. The changes are different from the present, and the changes are places to sit and be comfortable. These are things that make people feel welcome and convenient. So that means now they are perceived as unwelcome and inconvenient.
31. To give more examples of simple changes being made to slowly make society more convenient, welcoming and friendly towards elderly people.
32. All people can enjoy them.
33. Slow.
34. She acknowledges that the changes will probably not change the number of older people enjoying city centers.
35. Yes.
36. Because changes will be easier if thinking is different and bodies are healthy.
37. Free response
寻读被用于查找某个特殊的信息。在作文写作中或完成后，如果发现有些信息不够充分或被遗漏，可以极快地浏览并锁定文章中的某处位置查找细节信息。
寻读时应注意文章中的转换词和转折词（如additionally，but，in conclusion，therefore，although等）以及序列词（如firstly，secondly等）。
免责声明：以上内容源自网络，版权归原作者所有，如有侵犯您的原创版权请告知，我们将尽快删除相关内容。
